Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Darius Tahir results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 516 hits. Analysis detected 2,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,741 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,213 authors). This Darius Tahir is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Darius Tahir
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Darius Tahir (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,741
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.8%13.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos