Author summary
77% 2 analyzed articles/videos 861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Seitz results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 1,217 hits . Analysis detected 6,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,324 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,462 of 6,358 authors). This Amanda Seitz is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group. Amanda Seitz
Author details
Total words: 6,324
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.9% 15.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst