Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These CJ Womack results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 875 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,722 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,170 authors). This CJ Womack is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
CJ Womack
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%CJ Womack (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,722
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos