Author summary
86% 4 analyzed articles/videos 874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Cooper results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 5,024 hits . Analysis detected 23,867 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,714 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,041 of 6,628 authors). This Matthew Cooper is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. Matthew Cooper
Author details
Total words: 13,714
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 36.6% 36.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.3% 23.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 9.4%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst