Author summary
86%4 analyzed articles/videos874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Cooper results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 5,024 hits. Analysis detected 23,867 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,714 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,041 of 6,628 authors). This Matthew Cooper is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Matthew Cooper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
70%Matthew Cooper (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,714
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.6%36.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 23.3%23.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Author 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos