Speaker summary
38% 20 analyzed articles/videos 673.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maine Democratic Party results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Bandwagon , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 192 hits . Analysis detected 1,519.461 faulty-reasoning hits from 673.333 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,709 of 28,364 speakers). This Maine Democratic Party is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Maine Democratic Party
Speaker details
Total words: 673.333
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 7.2% BS Score20 analyzed videos673.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst