Speaker summary
55% 9 analyzed articles/videos 734.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Linda McMahon results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 220.635 hits . Analysis detected 1,700.457 faulty-reasoning hits from 734.333 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,675 of 28,364 speakers). This Linda McMahon is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Linda McMahon
Speaker details
Total words: 734.333
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.0% percentile 7.2% BS Score9 analyzed videos734.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 24.9% 24.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst