Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eleanor J. Bader results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 708 hits . Analysis detected 5,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of â 34% (4,242 of 6,360 authors). This Eleanor J. Bader is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Eleanor J. Bader
Author details
Total words: 7,964
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst