Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Joshua Fechter results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 923 hits . Analysis detected 7,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,315 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Joshua Fechter is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Joshua Fechter
Author details
Total words: 6,315
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst