Author summary
28% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Sausser results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 1,505 hits . Analysis detected 12,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,542 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,880 of 6,629 authors). This Lauren Sausser is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Lauren Sausser
Author details
Total words: 19,542
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst