Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Renuka Rayasam results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 460 hits . Analysis detected 3,913 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,898 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Renuka Rayasam is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Renuka Rayasam
Author details
Total words: 5,898
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst