Speaker summary
54% 5 analyzed articles/videos 273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Boebert results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 68.366 hits . Analysis detected 528.214 faulty-reasoning hits from 273 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (25,824 of 28,045 speakers). This Lauren Boebert is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Lauren Boebert
Speaker details
Total words: 273
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.9% percentile 8.3% BS Score5 analyzed videos273 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 21.7% 21.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Straw Man: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 0.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst