Speaker summary
73% 10 analyzed articles/videos 398.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Loomer results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Burden of Proof , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 196 hits . Analysis detected 1,378.663 faulty-reasoning hits from 398.333 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,500 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Loomer is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Laura Loomer
Speaker details
Total words: 398.333
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 9.4% BS Score10 analyzed videos398.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 29.9% 29.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 24.7% 24.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 16.6% 16.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 1.1% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 0.4% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst