Speaker summary
42% 23 analyzed articles/videos 963.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Whitmire results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 181.479 hits . Analysis detected 1,324.821 faulty-reasoning hits from 963.333 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,118 of 28,364 speakers). This John Whitmire is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. John Whitmire
Speaker details
Total words: 963.333
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score23 analyzed videos963.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst