Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New York Times Company results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 521 hits . Analysis detected 2,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,858 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This New York Times Company is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. New York Times Company
Author details
Total words: 3,858
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst