Speaker summary
41% 12 analyzed articles/videos 808.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Dolan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 111 hits . Analysis detected 1,101.739 faulty-reasoning hits from 808.333 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,870 of 26,105 speakers). This James Dolan is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. James Dolan
Speaker details
Total words: 808.333
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score12 analyzed videos808.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% No True Scotsman: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst