Author summary
ā 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Barba results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 154 hits . Analysis detected 1,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ā 51% (3,168 of 6,359 authors). This Robert Barba is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Robert Barba
Author details
Total words: 2,196
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst