Gothamist77%

Nearly 1K tickets issued to drivers in construction zone blitz, state police say 1%

By Robert Barba0%

5/10/2026, 10:36:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37.3% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 199 faulty-reasoning hits from 161 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,695 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the article peer group.

State troopers said they issued nearly 1,000 tickets to motorists during a blitz last month intended to bring attention to road worker safety. 
Between April 20 and 24, the New York State Police said it conducted 12 enforcement details at a dozen work zones across the state. 
In some cases, troopers were disguised as highway workers to identify violations. 
The state police said it issued 160 tickets for violations of New York’s Move Over Law, which requires drivers to slow down and move over when there is a vehicle parked on the side of the road. 
This year’s tally is an 84% increase from last year’s blitz. 
Speeding tickets made up the bulk of the citations, at 401. 
Such tickets rose by a third from a year earlier. 
According to the state police data, roughly a third of the stops were made along the New York State Thruway. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Robert Barba: 3.1%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.8%This article: 12.4%Robert Barba: 3.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic12.4%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 1.0%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.3%Robert Barba: 4.3%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect14.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 7.0%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 5.3%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 3.1%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.0%Robert Barba: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias13.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 37.3%Robert Barba: 5.8%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority37.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.8%Robert Barba: 0.5%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization6.8%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 2.1%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 1.0%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.0%Robert Barba: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 5.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 19.9%Robert Barba: 3.6%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)19.9%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.7%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Barba: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

161 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers65%attributed speech57writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageState troopers • 23 words • 0.0% coverageNew York State Police • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageNew York State Police • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNew York State Police • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

State troopers

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words22% of attributed speech77% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.