Keyword summary
13%3 analyzed articles/videos1,126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Police results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 383 hits. Analysis detected 2,612 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,504 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,235 of 37,536 keywords). This State Police is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
State Police
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
39%State Police (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,504
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate