New Jersey college DNA team identifies 1979 murder victim as police work to identify his killer 1%

By Owen Scott0%

4/24/2026, 10:33:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hindsight Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 478 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,707 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the article peer group.

A New Jersey college DNA team has identified a murder victim in a cold case dating all the way to 1979.  
The body was discovered in a shallow grave in a wooded area in Quinton Township, Salem County, 41 miles from Philadelphia. 
According to a statement from New Jersey State Police, the victim had suffered a gunshot wound to the head and died at some point during the winter of 1978-1979. 
Now, the victim has been identified as Robert Dean Irelan by a team at the Ramapo College Investigative Genetic Genealogy Center. 
The researchers told CBS News that they used DNA technology to search for family connections in the case.  
“In this case, we knew that our John Doe was located in South Jersey,” Tracie Boyle, a case manager at Ramapo College, said. 
“So we had been looking for any kind of connections to the Atlantic City area, and we were able to find them pretty quickly.” 
​Now, New Jersey State Police are searching for Irelan’s killer. 
The cops have already spoken to Irelan’s family, but are appealing to the public for more information. 
​“We're really hoping that the public will reach out and have something that they can give to the law enforcement agency and help figure out who did this,” Boyle added.​ 
The victim was found wearing white painter’s trousers, a plaid cotton shirt and Pro-Keds sneakers. 
His distinctive blue jacket, which was made by Lee, featured a gold-plated letter “R” on its right pocket flap and a small gold-plated cross on the left pocket flap.​ 
Irelan’s body was also found clothed in a black-and-white pullover sweater.  
According to police, he lived in Pleasantville, New Jersey, and was known for spending time in Atlantic City.  
The case was reopened in March 2023 and involved researchers carefully building a family tree in order to identify the victim.​ 
“We received a match list back from Match List Pro and Family Tree DNA, and we would just start building back the family trees of his genetic relatives, hoping to find common ancestors among them,” Boyle told WPVI. 
​Before Irelan was identified, investigators released a composite sketch of the victim. 
Eventually, a photograph of Irelan, whom investigators believe was in his late teens and early twenties, was found to match the victim.​ 
Herbert Ladner, a local resident who says he remembers hearing about the case when it first made headlines, told WPVI that the community is grateful for the advances in genetic technology. 
​“I think it will keep the crime down a little bit and, if not, make a little easier on the people that’s got to process it,” he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.3%Owen Scott: 1.6%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Owen Scott: 2.3%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.6%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 10.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.4%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Owen Scott: 5.5%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.7%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.6%This article: 17.2%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias17.2%This article: 6.1%Owen Scott: 0.5%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 8.4%The Independent: 12.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.4%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.1%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Owen Scott: 2.2%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.8%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.3%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Owen Scott: 0.7%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.6%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.9%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.6%Owen Scott: 4.4%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority14.6%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.1%Owen Scott: 2.3%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization6.1%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.4%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 5.9%The Independent: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 3.2%The Independent: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.8%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal6.8%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.8%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.5%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.0%Owen Scott: 2.8%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection5.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 3.1%The Independent: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.6%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.9%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Owen Scott: 1.3%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.3%

459 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers44%attributed speech256writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageNew Jersey State Police • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTracie Boyle • 23 words • 100.0% coverageTracie Boyle • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTracie Boyle • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTracie Boyle • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageHerbert Ladner • 31 words • 0.0% coverageHerbert Ladner • 28 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Herbert Ladner

100%flagged-word coverage
59 attributed words29% of attributed speech59% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.