Topic summary
⁠16%2 analyzed articles/videos459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dna Identification results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 2,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,965 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,357 of 16,512 topics). This Dna Identification is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Dna Identification
Topic details
Total words: 4,965
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos