Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Driving results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 220 faulty-reasoning hits from 644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,938 of 16,562 topics). This Driving is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Driving
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles644 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 9.3%9.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos