Speaker summary
77% 8 analyzed articles/videos 755.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Comer results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , False Dilemma , and Hasty Generalization , with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 206 hits . Analysis detected 2,078.951 faulty-reasoning hits from 755.667 analyzed words across 8 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (24,046 of 26,155 speakers). This James Comer is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. James Comer
Speaker details
Total words: 755.667
Content count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 8.5% BS Score8 analyzed videos755.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 22.1% 22.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 24.0% 24.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 0.4% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 5.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst