Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shelby Talcott results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,571 hits . Analysis detected 9,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,436 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,466 of 6,170 authors). This Shelby Talcott is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Shelby Talcott
Author details
Total words: 12,436
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst