Fox News98%

Walz ‘RETALIATED’ against fraud whistleblowers, Comer alleges 77%

6/9/2026, 12:15:26 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Burden of Proof, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 55.5% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 3,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 843 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.7% and a BS Rank of 77% (4,939 of 21,151 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the video peer group.

All right, tonight more bad news for Minnesota from Minnesota and thanks to its horrible governor, our friend Tampon 
Tim Walls, the House Oversight Committee is out with a new report tonight detailing the many failures from state leaders including Governor Walls that allowed fraud to run rampant. 
Among the findings, the fraud allegations date as far back as 2019. 
Some cases, the decision was made to keep the payments flowing in order to avoid accusations of racism. 
I guess in this case, well, they really did go woke and go broke except it was your money. 
Now, Vice President J.D. Vance received the report from the committee and announced tonight on X that he has asked the fraud division of the Department of Justice to launch a criminal probe of the Minnesota state officials who allowed this fraud to happen on their watch. 
We did reach out to Governor Walls' office for comment. 
Shockingly, we've not heard back. 
Here now with more details, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, 
Chairman James Comer of Kentucky. All right, Chairman, where are you going with this? 
>> Well, I'm really excited, Sean. We put a lot of time into this report. Want to brag on the committee and the committee staff, but the heroes of this report are the whistleblowers of Minnesota. 
We had nine whistleblowers who are career government employees in Minnesota who did the right thing. 
They saw fraud and they did exactly what they were supposed to do when they caught fraud. 
They reported it to their superiors. 
They reported it to Attorney General Keith Ellison and Governor Tim Walls. 
Time after time, the the governor and attorney general both turned a blind eye. 
When the whistleblowers continued to blow the whistle, then Governor Walls started retaliating against the whistleblowers. 
So, we have two crimes here. We have a crime of of negligence with our tax dollars and secondly, we have a crime of retaliating against whistleblowers. 
So, we sent a letter and the report to Vice President Vance who's done a tremendous job with his fraud task force in Minnesota and he referred it today to the Department of Justice. 
So, I think we're going to see real accountability here. 
We've already seen three dozen people arrested in Minnesota for being a part of this fraud and Sean, the only way you're ever going to stop public officials like Governor Walz and Attorney General Ellison from doing anything about fraud is you got to hold them accountable and that's what our committee did along with the help of Vice President Vance and now it's in the Department of Justice's hands and the evidence is there because of the whistleblowers and all the depositions and interviews we did with them that Governor Walz did turn a blind eye and retaliated against whistleblowers. 
>> Your committee found Minnesota estimated to lost 300 million in stolen federal nutrition funds intended for the hungry hungry children. 
during the COVID-19 pandemic as much as 9 billion in Medicare building billing that may have been fraudulent. 
9 billion in one state Congressman, seriously? 
>> That's substantial. I mean, that's a half the general fund budget for the entire state of Kentucky and this was just on welfare programs in Minnesota 
and and again, people ask well, how could this how could they get away with this? 
Well, they didn't. All the checks were in place. 
The government employees caught the fraud, but yet the governor and the attorney general didn't want to do anything Sean for political reasons. 
They didn't want to offend that massive Somali voting block they have in Minnesota. 
That is a big reason why Minnesota continues to stay blue in the presidential race and that's why they have a Democrat governor and a Democrat attorney general because of that voting base. 
So, anytime someone whistleblower or someone in Congress would say something about the fraud, they would say, "Oh, that's racist." 
That's racist." Or the Democrats would do their their normal business model say, "All the Republicans are wanting to cut off Medicaid. 
My governor in Kentucky tweeted that today. He picked a bad day to defend Minnesota. 
But at the at the end of the day, the people of America are sick and tired of sending their hard-earned tax dollars to Washington and then Washington sending that money to those states 
sending that money to those states 
[music] and the states just disregarding the taxpayers and allowing the fraud to continue. 
I'm I'm confident [music] something's going to be done. I appreciate Vice President Vance. 
>> I appreciate what you're doing. Keep us in the loop. That's a lot of [music] 
taxpayer money. Oz said it's hundreds and hundreds of billions. Unbelievable. 
Uh thank [music] you, James Comer. 
All right, thanks for watching. Check out my new podcast hanging out with me, 
Sean Hannity. The big interviews, the debates you won't get anywhere else. 
Like and subscribe for new episodes every Tuesday and Thursday. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias20.4%This article: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias1.7%This article: 21.9%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic21.9%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.6%This article: 4.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias4.7%This article: 25.7%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias25.7%This article: 9.0%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 4.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion4.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.3%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias8.3%This article: 6.2%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias6.2%This article: 55.5%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias55.5%This article: 11.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias11.4%This article: 8.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error8.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias4.9%This article: 5.6%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.6%This article: 13.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect13.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 2.6%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man2.6%This article: 18.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority18.4%This article: 17.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma17.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 12.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning12.0%This article: 9.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 10.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon10.0%This article: 32.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion32.0%This article: 2.7%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question2.7%This article: 8.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 28.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof28.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 7.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division7.2%This article: 17.6%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal17.6%This article: 2.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman2.4%This article: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground1.4%This article: 2.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity2.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.3%

843 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers53%attributed speech400writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Oversight Committee • 29 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Oversight Committee • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageVice President J.D. Vance • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Oversight Committee • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 36 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGovernor Tim Walls • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 27 words • 0.0% coverageVice President Vance • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 101 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Oversight Committee • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageOz • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJames Comer • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageSean Hannity • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

James Comer

98%flagged-word coverage
249 attributed words56% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%James Comer: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%James Comer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.