Speaker summary
54%8 analyzed articles/videos246.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Monetary Fund results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 74.326 hits. Analysis detected 253.691 faulty-reasoning hits from 246.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,901 of 28,364 speakers). This International Monetary Fund is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
International Monetary Fund

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.8% percentile
15.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos246.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate