Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 965 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Magid results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 486 hits . Analysis detected 4,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,808 of 6,628 authors). This Aaron Magid is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Aaron Magid
Author details
Total words: 3,860
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.6% 12.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Composition/Division: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst