Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzanne Nossel results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Pessimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,058 hits . Analysis detected 9,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,559 of 6,318 authors). This Suzanne Nossel is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Suzanne Nossel
Author details
Total words: 10,328
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst