Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These الشرق الأوسط results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 877 hits. Analysis detected 6,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (220 of 410 publications). This الشرق الأوسط is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
الشرق الأوسط
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 9,984
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

47% percentile
025507510046.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos