Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These الشرق الأوسط results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 877 hits . Analysis detected 6,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (220 of 410 publications). This الشرق الأوسط is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 9,984
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst