Speaker summary
35% 17 analyzed articles/videos 395.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These European Union results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 142 hits . Analysis detected 889.063 faulty-reasoning hits from 395.667 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 5% (25,599 of 26,862 speakers). This European Union is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group. European Union
Speaker details
Total words: 395.667
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.7% percentile 6.5% BS Score17 analyzed videos395.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Red Herring: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst