Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Kolbe results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Slippery Slope , and Pessimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 675 hits . Analysis detected 4,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,515 of 6,628 authors). This Thomas Kolbe is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. Thomas Kolbe
Author details
Total words: 3,620
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.2% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.6% 18.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.3% 16.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.5% 5.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst