The EU (Still) Wants to Control Your Speed Via Satellite 57%

By Byron Hurd44%

7/9/2026, 11:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 1,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 521 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,403 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the article peer group.

It has been a wild couple of weeks for the Big Brother news beat—wild enough that a particularly alarming item managed to slip beneath just about everybody ‘s radar. 
According to the Daily Mail , the European Commission wants the power to force cars to obey speed limits with help from GPS. 
European cars already leave the factory with speed monitoring systems installed, and no, I don’t just mean speedometers. 
Starting in 2024, the EU mandated that all new cars come equipped with a GPS-based system that tracks the current speed limit and alerts the driver audibly if it is exceeded. 
These “Intelligent Speed Assist” systems are often installed on cars sold outside the EU as well, though the warning component is often optional or disabled. 
This is apparently a “watered down” version of what the Commission initially wanted, which was a full-blown, satellite-based speed governing system. 
European automakers, likely fearing a massive customer backlash, lobbied hard to get the proposal tossed. 
Now, Commission officials are once again pushing for full control, the paper says. 
“This was always just an interim stage,” a source reportedly told the Mail . 
“But eventually we will just fix the speed of the car so you can’t go over the speed limit.” 
Could this be slippery-slope fear mongering? 
Consider the source, as always. 
But consider this too: We’re already seeing bits and pieces of the ISA tech trickling into U.S.-bound cars. 
If remote speed governors become mandatory in Europe, the tech itself likely will come here, even if it is rendered dormant by regional software packaging. 
On top of general public sentiment, there’s another problem with relying on ISAs as speed governors: they’re simply not accurate. 
According to a study in June, these GPS-based indicators miss critical events (such as a speed limit suddenly changing) up to 25% of the time . 
“The worst performing vehicle in real-world testing scored 91.3% accuracy across the driven distance,” the report said. 
“When assessed on an event-based metric, the system was 74.3% accurate. 
This means that for roughly 1 in 4 events, ISA is displaying the wrong speed limit.” 
“This is simply below the level of performance for most drivers to accept and trust ISA,” the report said. 
“The best performing vehicle in real-world testing scored 98.39% accuracy across the driven distance, which implies a near-perfect system,” the report continued. 
“This same vehicle’s event-based accuracy was 90.3%. 
This demonstrates with roughly 1 in 10 events being incorrect, even systems which perform comparatively well on UK roads are still not good enough for widespread acceptance.” 
But don’t worry, they’ve got a solution for that. 
These proposed super-ISAs will incorporate 5G data from nearby connected devices to fine-tune your location. 
That sounds awfully familiar . 
But it’s not such a big deal that we’re constantly being monitored , right? 
After all, if you’re not a criminal, you have nothing to worry about . 
Got a news tip? 
Let us know at tips@thedrive.com! 
The post The EU (Still) Wants to Control Your Speed Via Satellite appeared first on The Drive . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.9%Byron Hurd: 3.9%The Drive: 3.0%Confirmation Bias2.9%This article: 3.5%Byron Hurd: 1.3%The Drive: 1.1%Anchoring Bias3.5%This article: 17.1%Byron Hurd: 4.9%The Drive: 4.0%Availability Heuristic17.1%This article: 8.4%Byron Hurd: 1.9%The Drive: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic8.4%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.9%The Drive: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 2.6%The Drive: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Byron Hurd: 7.3%The Drive: 4.6%Framing Effect12.3%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 1.3%The Drive: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 1.1%The Drive: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.3%The Drive: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Byron Hurd: 3.9%The Drive: 3.6%Optimism Bias1.7%This article: 4.8%Byron Hurd: 1.8%The Drive: 2.0%Pessimism Bias4.8%This article: 23.8%Byron Hurd: 6.5%The Drive: 6.7%Negativity Bias23.8%This article: 2.7%Byron Hurd: 2.6%The Drive: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 2.9%Byron Hurd: 0.8%The Drive: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error2.9%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.8%The Drive: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Byron Hurd: 1.9%The Drive: 2.6%Halo Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.1%The Drive: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Byron Hurd: 1.1%The Drive: 1.3%Recency Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.6%The Drive: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Byron Hurd: 0.6%The Drive: 0.2%Ad Hominem1.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.0%Byron Hurd: 4.0%The Drive: 3.4%Appeal to Authority18.0%This article: 2.7%Byron Hurd: 1.9%The Drive: 1.9%False Dilemma2.7%This article: 8.4%Byron Hurd: 1.9%The Drive: 1.0%Slippery Slope8.4%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%Byron Hurd: 7.4%The Drive: 6.6%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.7%The Drive: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 1.3%The Drive: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.4%Byron Hurd: 3.6%The Drive: 3.9%Appeal to Emotion5.4%This article: 1.7%Byron Hurd: 1.1%The Drive: 0.7%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 3.5%Byron Hurd: 3.2%The Drive: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.5%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.2%The Drive: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.2%Byron Hurd: 0.7%The Drive: 0.3%Composition/Division5.2%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 3.1%The Drive: 3.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.2%The Drive: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.1%Byron Hurd: 2.0%The Drive: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.1%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.3%The Drive: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.3%The Drive: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.1%The Drive: 0.4%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 25.3%Byron Hurd: 3.4%The Drive: 2.1%Unattributed Quote25.3%This article: 8.1%Byron Hurd: 0.9%The Drive: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection8.1%This article: 18.0%Byron Hurd: 9.4%The Drive: 11.3%Biased Writer Voice18.0%This article: 5.4%Byron Hurd: 1.1%The Drive: 1.4%Indoctrination5.4%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.3%The Drive: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Byron Hurd: 0.1%The Drive: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Byron Hurd: 1.5%The Drive: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.7%

521 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers16%attributed speech436writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageDaily Mail • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageEuropean Union • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageEuropean Commission • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageThe Drive • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Daily Mail

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words27% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+95.6 ptsWriter: 4.4%Daily Mail: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+75.0 ptsWriter: 25.0%Daily Mail: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.6 ptsWriter: 21.6%Daily Mail: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.4 ptsWriter: 6.4%Daily Mail: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Daily Mail: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.