Author summary
⁠71%4 analyzed articles/videos1,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Cooper results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 888 hits. Analysis detected 5,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,154 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (2,260 of 6,347 authors). This Daniel Cooper is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Daniel Cooper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠65%Daniel Cooper (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,154
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.5%10.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 17.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos