Engadget41%

A strange attempt to revive the 3DO is already dead 29%

By Daniel Cooper71%

7/2/2026, 11:12:14 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.7% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 957 faulty-reasoning hits from 310 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.4% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,091 of 21,097 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the article peer group.

Last week a defunct British developer, Empire Interactive, returned from the void with a pledge to revive the 3DO, one of many '90s consoles which fell into the chasm of history. 
Today, the company said its plans have come to an abrupt conclusion and it has ended work to rebuild the hardware and remaster its games. 
It said the "emergence of multiple parties claiming ownership rights over both the games and the console" have sunk the project. 
It added it did not want to risk "prolonged legal disputes," which would have likely taken far more cost than any potential 3DO revival would make. 
Except, as Time Extension has been reporting, the situation is a little more complicated than Empire's LinkedIn posts make it out to be. 
If your childhood spanned the '90s, you may dimly recall the 3DO, a multimedia games console hybrid your friend's cousin's wealthy uncle apparently owned. 
3DO was one of a handful of also-ran platforms cut down in their prime by the PlayStation (and possibly the Saturn). 
Naturally, despite its short history and niche appeal there are enough devotees to attempt some sort of retro revival. 
But it appears that while new Empire Interactive owner Işık Şekercigil also owns the rights to the 3DO company name, it doesn't own any of the IP related to its console hardware or games. 
Those rights are reportedly held by Canadian company Throwback Entertainment, which told Time Extension it had no plans to sell them on. 
Either way, it doesn't look as if the store shelves of Best Buy will be full of new retro 3DO consoles ahead of the holiday season. 
I mean, even if they were, it's not as if anyone was elbowing their rivals out of the way to get one when they originally launched, was it. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.4%Daniel Cooper: 3.5%Engadget: 3.1%Confirmation Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 1.6%Engadget: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Daniel Cooper: 3.2%Engadget: 3.1%Availability Heuristic7.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 1.0%Engadget: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 15.8%Daniel Cooper: 1.0%Engadget: 0.6%Hindsight Bias15.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 1.2%Engadget: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 6.1%Engadget: 5.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Daniel Cooper: 2.0%Engadget: 1.1%Loss Aversion8.4%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.5%Engadget: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Daniel Cooper: 2.1%Engadget: 4.6%Optimism Bias6.1%This article: 11.6%Daniel Cooper: 3.7%Engadget: 2.2%Pessimism Bias11.6%This article: 30.0%Daniel Cooper: 4.7%Engadget: 6.9%Negativity Bias30.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 3.7%Engadget: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error11.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 1.6%Engadget: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 18.1%Daniel Cooper: 1.4%Engadget: 1.7%Recency Bias18.1%This article: 7.7%Daniel Cooper: 0.9%Engadget: 0.5%Primacy Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.5%Engadget: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.5%Daniel Cooper: 4.4%Engadget: 5.0%Appeal to Authority14.5%This article: 11.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.5%Engadget: 1.2%False Dilemma11.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 3.3%Engadget: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.8%Daniel Cooper: 5.1%Engadget: 5.2%Hasty Generalization6.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.3%Engadget: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 1.9%Engadget: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 10.5%Engadget: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.8%Engadget: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.8%Daniel Cooper: 0.8%Engadget: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.4%Daniel Cooper: 0.9%Engadget: 0.6%Burden of Proof8.4%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 26.8%Daniel Cooper: 1.5%Engadget: 2.4%Anecdotal26.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 23.5%Daniel Cooper: 3.0%Engadget: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)23.5%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.1%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Middle Ground6.1%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 22.3%Daniel Cooper: 3.5%Engadget: 2.9%Unattributed Quote22.3%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.9%Engadget: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 58.7%Daniel Cooper: 15.1%Engadget: 7.3%Biased Writer Voice58.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Cooper: 17.2%Engadget: 3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

310 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.