Speaker summary
47% 6 analyzed articles/videos 941.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Wilson results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Indoctrination , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 229 hits . Analysis detected 2,162.305 faulty-reasoning hits from 941.333 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,914 of 28,364 speakers). This Emily Wilson is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Emily Wilson
Speaker details
Total words: 941.333
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.6% percentile 4.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos941.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst