Author summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 1,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosa Cartagena results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 261 hits . Analysis detected 2,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,555 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,085 of 6,628 authors). This Rosa Cartagena is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Rosa Cartagena
Author details
Total words: 3,555
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst