Author summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 731 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HILLEL ITALIE AP national writer results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 149 hits . Analysis detected 1,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,193 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,472 of 6,628 authors). This HILLEL ITALIE AP national writer is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. HILLEL ITALIE AP national writer
Author details
Total words: 2,193
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst