Speaker summary
59% 77 analyzed articles/videos 2,117.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DHS results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 343 hits . Analysis detected 4,063.179 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,117.667 analyzed words across 77 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,969 of 28,364 speakers). This DHS is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. DHS
Speaker details
Total words: 2,117.667
Article count: 77
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 3.9% BS Score77 analyzed videos2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst