Dramatic new video shows army vet’s full attack on 26 Federal Plaza 55%

By Emma Seiwell50%

7/23/2026, 5:48:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 1,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 646 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.9% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,889 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the article peer group.

Dramatic new footage of a U.S. 
Army vet’s full attack on 26 Federal Plaza in Lower Manhattan shows several passersby running for cover as he points what looks like a rifle at them. 
Andrew Arrabaca, described as “quite clearly ill” by a federal judge, is being held without bail on an arson charge for starting a towering inferno near an employee entrance to the government building with a cocktail of gasoline and fireworks he toted in a wagon bearing a sign that read “ICE off our streets.” 
Video captures Arrabaca, 43, wearing a helmet, military-style camouflage pants and a tactical belt as he ignites a bag of fireworks on the sidewalk near the building, which houses offices for Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices and immigration courtrooms. 
As the fireworks begin smoking, a woman walks by unfazed as they start going off behind her. 
When a second pedestrian walks towards Arrabaca, the bag of fireworks tips over, and they begin shooting down the sidewalk and into the street. 
Arrabaca then pulls out what looks like a rifle, though authorities later said it was a pellet gun. 
The pedestrian runs for cover, along with three other people who were standing on the sidewalk. 
Afterwards, a pair of passersby walk past Arrabaca, seemingly unbothered as one firework, bursting into red sparks and smoke, goes off a few feet away from them. 
When Arrabaca pulls his pellet gun again, this time pointing it directly at the pair, they appear to run into the building. 
Arrabaca is then seen on video setting his gun down, before jogging over to an employee entrance at the building with a bucket of gasoline, pouring its contents on the ground and igniting a large blaze, around 8:20 a.m., FBI and NYPD officials said. 
Authorities said the veteran at one point fired pellets in the direction of the building. 
After he chucks a box of fireworks into the raging flames, a security guard spotted Arrabaca and pinned him against metal barriers lining the sidewalk. 
A man walking his dog happens upon the frantic scene as two other Federal Protective Service officers run to assist the guard. 
James Barnacle, the assistant director of the FBI’s New York field division, said the former soldier served from 2001 to 2005, while in his early 20s, repairing Patriot missile systems. 
Arrabaca allegedly expressed suicidal behavior in comments to law enforcement after his arrest. 
He allegedly said the building, which has repeatedly been the center of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in New York, was his target. 
He also said he accepted the risk that he or others could have been killed. 
“His goal was to target the building," Barnacle said. 
"He did say he was targeting the building and it was OK if he hurt or killed people going in or out of the building, whether they were federal employees or civilians.” 
One of the FPS officers suffered minor injuries. 
A lone civilian at 26 Federal Plaza for a hearing to apply for asylum was injured as well. 
“So that's quite unfortunate but quite ironic at the same time,” Barnacle said. 
In addition to the fireworks, a BB rifle and a pellet rifle, the veteran was armed with “a machete, two hatchets,  a mallet and a hammer” according to the complaint. 
A DHS spokesperson said investigators also recovered a manifesto in Arrabaca's bag. 
Arrabaca is from Poughkeepsie and his most recent address is in Harlem, where he traveled from to Penn Station late Sunday before sleeping in the vicinity of the Holland Tunnel and then making his way to Lower Manhattan around 5 a.m., Barnacle said. 
A law enforcement source said the suspect is outspoken on Instagram about various causes and appears to have attended a pro-Palestinian rally at Grand Army Plaza in Brooklyn earlier this year. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 23.2%Emma Seiwell: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias23.2%This article: 2.8%Emma Seiwell: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias2.8%This article: 20.7%Emma Seiwell: 3.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Availability Heuristic20.7%This article: 10.8%Emma Seiwell: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic10.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Emma Seiwell: 5.8%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Emma Seiwell: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias5.0%This article: 20.7%Emma Seiwell: 11.4%newyorkdailynews: 9.8%Negativity Bias20.7%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Emma Seiwell: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error4.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 4.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.7%Emma Seiwell: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.3%Emma Seiwell: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority13.3%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.6%Emma Seiwell: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization11.6%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.3%Emma Seiwell: 10.0%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion13.3%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.1%Emma Seiwell: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.1%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 11.8%Emma Seiwell: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof11.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.8%Emma Seiwell: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.2%Emma Seiwell: 1.9%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote6.2%This article: 1.4%Emma Seiwell: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 2.8%Emma Seiwell: 3.9%newyorkdailynews: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice2.8%This article: 4.8%Emma Seiwell: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination4.8%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emma Seiwell: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

646 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker20%attributed speech519writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJames Barnacle • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJames Barnacle • 9 words • 100.0% coverageJames Barnacle • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJames Barnacle • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJames Barnacle • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

James Barnacle

100%flagged-word coverage
127 attributed words100% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Quote-first Misdirection+7.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%James Barnacle: 7.1%7.1%Unattributed Quote+1.1 ptsWriter: 6.0%James Barnacle: 7.1%7.1%Indoctrination-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%James Barnacle: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%James Barnacle: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.