Topic summary
49% 74 analyzed articles/videos 34,628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Crime results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 18,437 hits . Analysis detected 112,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 143,850 analyzed words across 74 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,427 of 15,325 topics). This Nyc Crime is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Nyc Crime
Topic details
Total words: 143,850
Article count: 74
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score74 analyzed articles143.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst