Teenager confronted for talking too loud on phone on NYC bus shoots critic dead 6%

By Kerry Burke34% Colin Mixson63% Rocco Parascandola54%

6/8/2026, 8:44:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 59.5% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 321 faulty-reasoning hits from 148 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (19,339 of 20,517 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the article peer group.

A 41-year-old man was shot to death after confronting a teen rider for talking too loudly on his phone aboard a Bronx MTA bus Monday  and his killer remains on the loose, cops said. 
The victim was struck in the stomach on a Bx36 bus on E. 
Tremont Ave. near White Plains Road about 2:30 p.m., police said. 
Police sources said the victim had confronted the gunman about speaking too loudly on a phone, when the male teen pulled a pistol and shot him. 
Medics rushed the victim to Jacobi Medical Center, where he died. 
His name was not immediately released. 
The shooter was last seen fleeing south on White Plains Road and has not been caught. 
He was wearing a white T-shirt and carrying a black handgun, according to law enforcement sources. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.6%Kerry Burke: 2.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias17.6%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 23.6%Kerry Burke: 4.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic23.6%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Kerry Burke: 5.6%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Kerry Burke: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias10.8%This article: 43.9%Kerry Burke: 10.1%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias43.9%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 4.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 28.4%Kerry Burke: 3.6%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority28.4%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 9.1%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 2.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 4.0%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 59.5%Kerry Burke: 2.9%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote59.5%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 23.6%Kerry Burke: 4.6%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice23.6%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kerry Burke: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

148 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.