Speaker summary
43%8 analyzed articles/videos186.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department of State results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 300.646 faulty-reasoning hits from 186.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,614 of 28,364 speakers). This Department of State is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510020.3% percentile
14.1% BS Score8 analyzed videos186.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.7%12.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate