Author summary
⁠47%5 analyzed articles/videos1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carter Schroppe results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 843 hits. Analysis detected 4,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,645 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (3,259 of 6,316 authors). This Carter Schroppe is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Carter Schroppe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠49%Carter Schroppe (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,645
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos