BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 34.6% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 1,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 534 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82% and a BS Rank of 89% (2,401 of 21,172 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the article peer group.

Things in the Middle East are growing very spicy indeed, with two American service members killed in the line of duty and President Trump ordering, shall we say, a vigorous reply to be visited upon Iran. 
Things are liable to get worse before they get better, and now the Trump administration is taking steps to keep Americans in the rest of the world safe. 
On Saturday, the State Department issued a travel warning to Americans traveling abroad. 
Worldwide Caution: Due to heightened tensions in the Middle East, the security environment remains complex with the potential for unforeseen escalation. 
We remind Americans in the region of the continued need for caution and encourage them to monitor the news for breaking developments. 
The Department of State advises Americans worldwide, and especially in the Middle East, to exercise increased caution. 
Americans abroad should follow the guidance in security alerts issued by the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate. 
Flight cancellations and periodic airspace closures may cause travel disruptions. 
U.S. diplomatic facilities, including outside the Middle East, have been targeted. 
Groups supportive of Iran may target other U.S. interests overseas or locations associated with the United States and/or Americans throughout the world. 
Please read carefully our Travel Advisory, country information, and any recent security alerts when planning travel at http://travel.state.gov/destination. 
You can read the entire warning here. 
The State Department also has detailed tips on improving your personal security here. 
UPDATED: CENTCOM Reports 2 US Fatalities in Iranian Attack on Jordan; SecWar Hegseth Reacts 
Report: President Trump Orders CENTCOM to 'Rain Hell' on IRGC After US Service Members Killed 
We really do live in interesting times, in the sense of that supposed old Chinese curse. 
It's maybe not the best time for that vacation in Dubai. 
In fact, Americans shouldn't just exercise increased caution when abroad. 
It's a good idea here in these United States, as well. 
It's a near-certainty that Iranian nationals infiltrated into the United States during Joe Biden's four years of non-border enforcement. 
Some of them may likely be under the control of the Iranian civil government or, worse, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). 
Keep your head on a swivel. 
Always be aware of your surroundings at all times, whether you are at a high school hockey game, the grocery store, or in your bank. 
If you're experienced with a sidearm, and you can do so in your jurisdiction, carry one, all the time. 
Always stay at least in Condition Yellow. 
Always be alert. 
If you are in another country, always know where the nearest American consulate or embassy is. 
Awareness is the first step in survival. 
Always keep your eyes open. 
And this year may not be the ideal year for an American to be traveling abroad. 
There's a war on, after all. 
Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. 
Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. 
Help us report the truth about the Trump administration's decisive actions to keep Americans safe and bring peace to the world. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 6.5%RedState: 7.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Ward Clark: 4.6%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 1.3%Ward Clark: 1.7%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.3%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.7%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Ward Clark: 3.1%RedState: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias3.6%This article: 3.9%Ward Clark: 8.2%RedState: 9.3%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.6%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.8%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.4%This article: 2.4%Ward Clark: 3.0%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 13.3%Ward Clark: 1.3%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias13.3%This article: 24.7%Ward Clark: 9.5%RedState: 14.1%Negativity Bias24.7%This article: 3.9%Ward Clark: 2.2%RedState: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.5%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 5.7%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.9%RedState: 3.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.5%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Ward Clark: 0.8%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 3.9%RedState: 7.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 2.0%RedState: 2.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.7%Ward Clark: 2.4%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority13.7%This article: 5.4%Ward Clark: 2.2%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma5.4%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.2%Ward Clark: 10.6%RedState: 10.2%Hasty Generalization17.2%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.3%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.9%Ward Clark: 6.7%RedState: 8.7%Appeal to Emotion10.9%This article: 3.6%Ward Clark: 1.3%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question3.6%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.8%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.1%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.0%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.0%Ward Clark: 2.8%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal3.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.3%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.3%Ward Clark: 1.6%RedState: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.3%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.3%Ward Clark: 1.7%RedState: 2.5%Unattributed Quote10.3%This article: 5.4%Ward Clark: 0.6%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection5.4%This article: 23.0%Ward Clark: 19.9%RedState: 22.0%Biased Writer Voice23.0%This article: 34.6%Ward Clark: 6.8%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination34.6%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Ward Clark: 12.3%RedState: 15.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias11.2%This article: 6.7%Ward Clark: 2.9%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.7%

534 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers13%attributed speech464writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageState Department • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of State • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageState Department • 13 words • 0.0% coverageCENTCOM • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
13 attributed words19% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +89.9 ptsWriter: 10.1%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-36.2 ptsWriter: 36.2%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-26.5 ptsWriter: 26.5%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-11.9 ptsWriter: 11.9%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.8 ptsWriter: 7.8%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.