Speaker summary
32% 11 analyzed articles/videos 763 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Hearn results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Actor-Observer Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 144.244 hits . Analysis detected 835.813 faulty-reasoning hits from 763 analyzed words across 11 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,799 of 28,364 speakers). This David Hearn is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group. David Hearn
Speaker details
Total words: 763
Content count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score11 analyzed videos763 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst