Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah N. Lynch results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,501 hits . Analysis detected 11,017 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,360 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,833 of 6,215 authors). This Sarah N. Lynch is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Sarah N. Lynch
Author details
Total words: 12,360
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst