Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Casselberry results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 483 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,526 of 6,263 authors). This Ian Casselberry is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Ian Casselberry
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
60%Ian Casselberry (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,344
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 10.0%10.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 5.3%5.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos