Speaker summary
⁠68%4 analyzed articles/videos121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Center Watch results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50.7% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 287 faulty-reasoning hits from 121 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,944 of 28,364 speakers). This Data Center Watch is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Data Center Watch
Speaker details
Total words: 121
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
35.8% BS Score4 analyzed videos121 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.7%50.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 12.9%12.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos