Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,310 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Barnes results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 535 hits . Analysis detected 5,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,708 of 6,628 authors). This Luke Barnes is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Luke Barnes
Author details
Total words: 5,240
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.3% 7.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst