Author summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Wheeler results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , False Dilemma , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 533 hits . Analysis detected 4,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,197 of 6,467 authors). This Tom Wheeler is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Tom Wheeler
Author details
Total words: 2,424
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.5% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.0% 22.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.6% 18.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 14.5% 14.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.7% 13.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Author 14.5%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst