Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Power results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 1,139 hits . Analysis detected 4,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,086 of 6,359 authors). This John Power is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. John Power
Author details
Total words: 5,204
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 21.9% 21.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 21.9%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst